Humour

I can’t help but notice how shit things that are supposed to be funny are, it’s all dumbed down and in-your-face so that stupid people can understand it.  I think people are scared to cross boundaries and be contentious, in case they offend their audience and lose them.  Frankie Boyle is one known for his risque material, he tries to offend but it’s lost its edge now, making the same joke over and over again stopped being funny after the fifth time.  One liners make me laugh but they aren’t funny, like some other low forms of wit, they may be clever but all-in-all they’re a really poor form of humour.  Much like one liners, slapstick is pretty poor too and you shouldn’t be proud of making people laugh with that most of the time, I’ll get onto that later.

Loads of comedians today are plain shite, for example Russell Howard, Russell Kane and Sarah Millican, and others who use Mock the Week to launch their career and see it dwindle from there.  All what Howard does is make spazzy noises, with actions to match and think that adding anything associated to a rude part of the body to — what would have been — a perfectly alright line would make it totally outrageous.  He also makes out his family members are hilarious; his brother or gran supposedly persistently coming out with smarmy jibes towards a prominent figure, when they so obviously don’t.  Kane is a ponce, still trapped in the closet, moaning about having women’s problems all the time whilst pirouetting across the stage with his shit hair.

Russell Howard has somehow made a career copying a Phoenix Nights scene.

Russell Howard has somehow made a career copying a Phoenix Nights scene.

Millican never shuts up about women problems — in her irritating, high pitched North-Eastern accent — thinking that misogynism is funny.  I’m not a feminist but her material is piss poor, it’s like guys who go ‘why are those women playing football?  They should be in the kitchen!’; it isn’t the sexism which makes those sort of “jokes” shit, that stuff got old pretty quickly in the ’70s.  I could write her a tour where she bickers on about eating cake and menstrual cramps, I could reel in the quids.  There’s that other one, with the puppet monkey, making a living off ripping off the Knowing Me Knowing You with Alan Partridge ‘Cheeky Monkey’ skit from 1994.

James Corden, now he’s a prick.  I bet he thinks he has lots of mates and shows off to them for laughs yet behind his back, they call him a twat.  He probably has ADHD, and would wither and die without attention he so desperately craves.  If he was the only person left on Earth, he would die because there’s no one to take notice of him.  Also he makes jokes about his weight, like wears swimming trunks or a leotard because he’s a cretinous dick.  Vic Reeves and Bob Mortimer (or Reeves and Mortimer or Vic and Bob) are a pair I don’t find funny, what is funny about grown men hitting each other in the face with pans and blowing a drain pipe in someone’s face?  I liked them in the revival of Randall and Hopkirk (Deceased) though, even though I was like 9 back when that was on.

Hilarious.

There’s something about “comedians” that makes them better actors, probably because the humour is a lot more subtle.  Jack Whitehall is a shit, snobby stand-up but I didn’t mind him in Fresh Meat although I’m not fond of that — that Scottish bloke sounds like an Englishman putting on a Scottish accent and the black girl has an annoying tone of voice, making herself sound like she’s a bit dense.  Miranda, on the other hand, is all-round awful.  God knows how she or her eponymous show have been given the green light by the commissioning gods at the BBC, it makes me weep for humanity.

The people who actually think those lot are funny — with the possible exception of Vic and Bob for being old and a bit past my time — are the sort who chase the reflection of a watch face across the carpet, trying to catch it.  The difference between them mentioned prior and the Chuckle Brothers is that the Chuckle Brothers’ target audience are little kids, people who slapstick is really aimed for.  7 year olds aren’t expected to understand smarmy comments that mummy and daddy laugh at, their comedy needs to be obvious and that’s why Paul and Barry Chuckle have a charm about them.

Loads of “comedy” programmes need to add a laughter track so they force the laughter onto you, like Two Broke Girls, laughter track after shitty innuendo each time.  Scrubs didn’t bother with a laughter track and rightly so, although they try so hard to be funny but it very rarely is, at least it didn’t try to force me to laugh.  I laughed at that show three times, twice in the same episode at a little child’s expense (a doctor dropped spaghetti on his head and he got called ‘gay’ by him later) probably because laughing at that is wrong, and the other time wasn’t that funny.

Jackanackanory

I’m Alan Partridge is funny and has a laughter track and so is The Big Bang Theory, I’m sure they do it for emphasis.  I didn’t think much of either show at first but you need time to understand the humour, TBBT has admittedly lost its edge in later seasons for revolving around soppy love scenes far too often.  The laughs aren’t cheap, they’re fully deserved.  Alan Partridge is just a narrow-minded Steve Coogan with a curved lip, yet he has given it its own personality — Coogan would be classed as bipolar if he didn’t have Partridge at his disposal to let his true self go.  One thing that comedians can get away with is making pig ignorant statements because it appears they say them for jokes, whether they are being serious or not.  But when it’s someone else who says stuff like that, they’re a stupid idiot, unless they say it at an open mic session.  Strange one, that.

I snigger at sly, “under the radar” comments that go unappreciated by everyone else.  I snigger at football commentators pronouncing rude sounding names, or trying to avoid vulgar pronunciations, and using sporting lingo like ‘cross-cum-shot’.  I think what makes the latter funny is that sport is not intended to be funny, unless Mark Lawrenson is appointed as the summariser.  My sense of humour isn’t highbrow, my standards are higher than most peoples’, that is all.  I’m not one to blow my own trumpet but people say I’m funny, I think my style is observational if anything, dunno.  I suppose I do observe and comment.

Liverpool Football Club

There’s no denying the amount of success they’ve had in the past but they have been plagued with a severe bout of delusion in all quarters.  Right now they may be falling from grace but history tells us that they are the best English team in European football and second most successful team domestically but off the pitch, they’re nothing short of being a barrel of laughs.  They never blame themselves for their own undoing, make themselves the victims and search for a scapegoat.

We all know about the whole Luis Suarez saga, where the Uruguayan racially abused African-born French player Patrice Evra.  Suarez admitted to using the term ‘negrito’, which translates to “little black”, claiming it means “friend” in Uruguay.  The Scousers fell for that and quickly accused Manchester United’s Mexican striker Javier Hernandez of being a racist, as he used the term to describe his ex-Guadalajara teammate Omar Esparza — which incidentally is what he’s affectionately known as.   The difference between Esparza and Evra is that Esparza is Latin American, the term isn’t offensive to him.  Calling someone black is only racist when it’s used in a derogatory and offensive manner, take the Anton Ferdinand/John Terry case for example.

How the club handled the farce was a joke; making out he’s been victimised by the press, wearing T-shirts showing their support, blaming Evra for the handshake incident, and saying Evra has history of playing the racism card when that is a complete and utter lie.  We all know Luis Suarez has a history of being a complete prick; in November 2010 he bit an opposing player on the neck, that handball incident in the World Cup that year against the African nation of Ghana, and various times he goes in for a horrendous tackle and then has the audacity to feign injury himself.

Conclusive proof that Suarez isn’t racist.

After their Champions League win in 2005, one Liverpool fan who was on holiday in Bulgaria at the time assaulted a local waiter with his mates and he, Michael Shields, hit him over the head with an 8lb stone.  Shields even pleaded his innocence, with someone he knew tried to come forward for the attack but later withdrew their false confession and denying any involvement.  The club were supportive of him as you’d expect, wearing T-shirts requesting for his release.  The British government pardoned Shields purely because he was a British citizen who was on holiday, with no evidence supporting him.

JUSTICE FOR PURPLE AKI

What Liverpool fans are notoriously known for is their involvement in the Heysel Stadium disaster, shortly before the kick-off of the 1985 European Cup final.  39 Juventus fans were crushed to death when a wall collapsed on them, whilst trying to escape from rioting Liverpool fans who broke through a line of policemen.  John Smith, their chairman at the time, blamed Chelsea fans (who haven’t played in Europe since 1971 and didn’t again until 1994) for the incident even though a number of Liverpool fans were charged for manslaughter.  It only took them 20 years to claim responsibility, when Liverpool and Juventus met for the first time since the tragedy.

They call Manchester United fans disgraceful for chanting “we’ve won it three times, without killing anyone” and for independent outlets selling shirts quoting that.  Heysel chants are not disgraceful, it’s not mocking the dead, it merely brings to light the shame Liverpool FC and its supporters want to hide.  Let’s not forget Heysel did affect United as all English clubs were barred from Europe for five years, banning the club from participating in at least three seasons of European football.  United did get their just desserts and made English football proud, winning the 1990-91 Cup Winners’ Cup as soon as the ban on all but the ‘Pool was lifted.

One campaign Liverpool fans won’t be fighting for, they probably found it offensive.

There is a double standard among their fans, head hunting former manager Roy Hodgson because he wasn’t bringing the results, thinking they deserve to win the league every season (which they haven’t done so since 1990).  When Kenny Dalglish was at the helm straight after, his results were just as bad but he was immune to hatred because of the God-like status the Scousers given him in the ’80s, he could get the club relegated and they still won’t turn his back on him.  Fair enough he did help the club to their first piece of silverware in 6 years, in the form of the League Cup.  Only because teams of the same calibre field their reserves and fringe players in that competition — as it plays second fiddle to the prestigious FA Cup — whilst he fielded his full-strength side every time even against lower league opposition.  When Championship outfit Cardiff City takes a fully strong top-10 Premier League squad to a penalty shootout in the final, that does speak volumes regarding Dalglish’s tactical approach.  I’ve heard one fan blame Sir Alex Ferguson for undermiming the League Cup, that’s how bitter they are.

They can never accept how poor their squad is.  If it’s not the manager, it’s the referee’s fault.  They think there’s some conspiracy with The Football Association favouring Man United, that’s not remotely true.  I’ve previously stated, the FA’s problem with United predates any issue they have with most other clubs.